Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
64
Highlights
45
Differences
4
Reactions
0
Likes
Sennheiser MKE 400
vs
Rode VideoMic GO:
64 Highlights & 45 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
MKE 400 delivers premium sound and low noise for professional use. VideoMic GO keeps it simple with USB compatibility and a lightweight design.
Trying to decide between Sennheiser MKE 400 and Rode VideoMic GO? This microphones face-off covers tone, controls, design, and key width, connection interface, power source & body material that musicians care about.
Sennheiser MKE 400 vs. Rode VideoMic GO: A Comprehensive Shotgun Mic Showdown
When it comes to selecting a reliable shotgun microphone for professional video production, podcasting, or studio use, the Sennheiser MKE 400 and Rode VideoMic GO emerge as two popular contenders. Both mics are condenser shotgun models with supercardioid polar patterns designed to capture focused sound from the subject while minimizing ambient noise. They share basic features such as wired connectivity, shock mounts for vibration damping, and compatibility with cameras. However, beneath these surface similarities lie fundamental distinctions in design, audio performance, connectivity, and user control that influence which microphone suits particular recording needs best.
The Sennheiser MKE 400 emphasizes superior audio fidelity and extensive manual control, making it a versatile tool for users demanding studio-grade quality across multiple platforms, including PC, Mac, iOS, Android, and cameras. Meanwhile, the Rode VideoMic GO targets simplicity and ease of use with a plug-in power source and USB-C charging support, catering to beginner or budget-conscious creators primarily focusing on on-camera recording.
Unpacking the Strengths of the Sennheiser MKE 400
At the heart of the MKE 400 is a small diaphragm condenser capsule paired with a studio-grade preamp, enabling an expansive frequency range of 50 Hz to 20,000 Hz and a robust maximum sound pressure level of 132 dB, which comfortably handles loud sources without distortion. This wide frequency spectrum and high max SPL make it ideal for capturing both subtle nuances and powerful sounds with excellent clarity and low distortion.
The mic offers genuine manual versatility with an integrated gain control and a multi-mode switch featuring sensitivity presets for various recording environments, empowering users to tailor audio capture precisely. The onboard headphone monitoring capability, combined with LED indicator lights, ensures practical real-time oversight of sound quality and power status.
Physically, the MKE 400's metal body and grill lend it durability and professionalism, enhanced by corrosion resistance and an internal shockmount with foam dampening for superior noise isolation. A windscreen is included, improving outdoor recordings by minimizing wind noise. The microphone also supports detachable cables, allowing for more convenient cable replacement and compatibility. Power-wise, it runs on replaceable AAA batteries with a life of about 100 hours, plus external power supply compatibility; ideal for long shoots.
Its compatibility is broad, supporting PC, Mac, iOS, Android, and cameras, making it flexible for different recording setups. The package is generous, including cables, a carrying case, adapters, a mounting clip, an extra windscreen, and a protective foam insert, underscoring its professional orientation.
Exploring the Appeal of the Rode VideoMic GO
The Rode VideoMic GO is crafted with simplicity and affordability in mind. This condenser shotgun mic has a narrower frequency response of 100 Hz to 16,000 Hz and a maximum SPL of 120 dB, limiting its capability to capture some of the ultra-low and very high-frequency details found in more advanced mics. Nonetheless, it delivers clean and clear audio for basic on-camera sound recording tasks.
The mic integrates a standard internal preamp with no manual gain control, making it straightforward but less customizable. Users benefit from a mute function and can access app/software integration featuring EQ presets, which is an excellent convenience for beginners refining their sound without hardware adjustments.
Physically, the VideoMic GO features a lightweight plastic body and grill, making it easy to carry but less rugged compared to metal-bodied alternatives. The built-in shock mount with rubberized internal dampening and included pop filter serve to reduce handling noise and plosives. A windscreen is also provided to help outdoor use, but without the advanced wind noise management seen in the Sennheiser.
The mic's connectivity uses a fixed, non-detachable wired USB-C and TRS interfaces, powered through plug-in power rather than batteries. This setup simplifies operation by eliminating battery changes but limits usage flexibility for extended or battery-free setups.
In terms of dimensions, the VideoMic GO is taller and deeper but lighter than the MKE 400, which may impact portability based on your rig's configuration. Accessory-wise, it comes with cables and a mounting clip but lacks a carrying case or additional adapters, reflecting its more entry-level positioning.
Quick Take
The Sennheiser MKE 400 shines as a versatile, professional-grade shotgun microphone with manual gain control, superior audio range, and durable metal construction. It's an excellent choice for creators who want robust features and pristine sound quality across multiple devices. On the other hand, the Rode VideoMic GO offers an affordable, user-friendly package that fits well for beginners or casual videographers prioritizing simplicity and light weight over advanced controls and extended frequency capture.
Bottom Line
If your primary focus is high-quality sound capture with flexible control and a rugged build for varied recording environments, the Sennheiser MKE 400 is unquestionably the better investment despite its higher price tag of about $219 at B&H Photo Video. Conversely, if you lean toward a plug-and-play setup with fewer bells and whistles and need something lightweight and wallet-friendly, the Rode VideoMic GO fits nicely, especially for straightforward camera audio needs.
Verdict
Winner: Sennheiser MKE 400 - Comprehensive manual controls, superior audio performance, and professional build make it the top pick for demanding creators.
Runner-up: Rode VideoMic GO - Best suited for beginner users and budget-conscious individuals wanting simple, practical on-camera audio without complex adjustments.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Can’t decide between Sennheiser MKE 400 and Rode VideoMic GO? We compared their key music features, hidden gems, pros and cons, and price-to-value for each microphone.
80
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
PC, Mac, iOS, Android, Camera
39
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Camera
vs
Compatibility
The MKE 400 offers broader compatibility with PC, Mac, iOS, Android, and Cameras, while the VideoMic GO is only listed as compatible with cameras, indicating the MKE 400 is better for multi-platform recording setups.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 was released in 2020, while the VideoMic GO came out in 2022, making the VideoMic GO the newer model with potentially more updated features and technology.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Year of Release on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 is made in Germany, a country known for its precision engineering, whereas the VideoMic GO is manufactured in Australia. This difference might influence preferences for origin or perceived build quality.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Intended Use
The MKE 400 supports a broad range of uses including studio, live, podcast, broadcast, instrument, and streaming, offering more versatile applications compared to the VideoMic GO, which does not specify intended uses.
Describes the primary application area.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 supports multiple mounting types like stand, boom arm, clip, and shock mount, making it adaptable to various setups, whereas VideoMic GO only supports a shock mount, which is more limited in mounting flexibility.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Recording Application Category
MKE 400 excels with recording applications including studio, live, podcast, broadcast, streaming, and field recording, while VideoMic GO lacks listed recording application categories, suggesting less focus on diverse professional uses.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
58
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Condenser
49
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Condenser
Sennheiser MKE 400
This is a condenser microphone, which is ideal for capturing clear, accurate audio in both studio and live settings.
Rode VideoMic GO
This condenser microphone delivers clear and detailed audio ideal for voices and natural sound. It’s great for creators who need studio-quality capture without complex setup.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
66
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
MKE 400
76
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
VideoMic GO
Sennheiser MKE 400
The MKE 400 is a compact shotgun microphone, designed for high-quality sound capture in a variety of settings.
Rode VideoMic GO
The VideoMic GO is one of Rode’s most lightweight shotgun mics made for on-camera use. It’s simple to operate, making it ideal for vloggers and mobile filmmakers.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Form Factor
What is the form factor?
68
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Shotgun
59
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Shotgun
Sennheiser MKE 400
As a shotgun microphone, the MKE 400 excels at directional audio capture, making it ideal for recording focused sound while minimizing background noise.
Rode VideoMic GO
The shotgun design focuses sound directly in front of the mic, reducing surrounding noise. It’s perfect for interviews, outdoor scenes, or any situation where you need clear directional audio.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Form Factor on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
38
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Wired
39
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Wired
Sennheiser MKE 400
Wired connection ensures consistent and reliable audio performance, without worrying about battery or signal interference issues common with wireless setups.
Rode VideoMic GO
It connects via a simple wired TRS plug for dependable, lag-free sound. This setup ensures stable audio without wireless interference.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Type
What is the polar pattern type?
73
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Supercardioid
84
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Supercardioid
Sennheiser MKE 400
The supercardioid pattern focuses on sound directly in front of the microphone, ideal for capturing voice or instruments from a specific direction.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
38
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Black
39
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Black
Sennheiser MKE 400
A standard black color, providing a professional and unobtrusive appearance for use in various recording environments.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
48
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Unisex
99
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Unisex
Sennheiser MKE 400
Suitable for all users, regardless of gender, making it a versatile choice for a wide audience.
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
51 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
83
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Adult, Professional
69
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Adult
Sennheiser MKE 400
Aimed at adult professionals in the audio industry, this mic meets the needs of advanced users looking for high-quality recordings.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
14 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level
What is the user skill level?
48
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Beginner, Intermediate, Professional
49
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Beginner, Intermediate, Professional
Sennheiser MKE 400
Whether you're a beginner, intermediate, or professional, the MKE 400 offers high-quality performance at all skill levels.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
98
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Global
99
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Global
Sennheiser MKE 400
Available globally, this microphone can be easily accessed by audio professionals worldwide.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Limited Edition
Is it a limited/special edition?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Sennheiser MKE 400
Not a limited edition model, available year-round for purchase.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 is slightly narrower at 2.64 inches wide compared to the VideoMic GO’s 2.87 inches, indicating the latter is marginally bulkier which may affect portability or fit in tight spaces.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
At 1.46 inches tall, the MKE 400 is more slim compared to the VideoMic GO's 3.11 inches height, enhancing its discreet appearance and making it easier to mount where space is a premium.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 weighs 0.21 lbs (95 g), slightly heavier than the VideoMic GO at 0.16 lbs (73 g), but both are very lightweight, favoring ease of transport and minimal added weight to setups.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
equal
0.21 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 measures 4.96 inches deep, significantly more compact than the VideoMic GO's 6.57 inches, offering greater ease of handling and positioning in smaller setups.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1.6 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
20
ft
0Votes
vs
Cable Length
VideoMic GO offers a long 20 ft (6.1 m) cable, great for flexible placement, whereas MKE 400's cable length is not specified, which might limit user flexibility for distant setups.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.8
inch
0Votes
vs
Capsule Diameter
VideoMic GO has a known capsule diameter of 0.8 inch, but MKE 400’s capsule diameter isn't specified, leaving capsule size advantage uncertain, though VideoMic GO's capsule size may influence its sound pick-up area.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.5
inch
0Votes
vs
Capsule Length
VideoMic GO features a capsule length of 0.5 inch, while MKE 400 does not specify this, meaning the physical internal capsule size and thus potential audio characteristics might differ.
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.25
inch
0Votes
vs
Grill Diameter
VideoMic GO grill diameter is 1.25 inches, with the MKE 400 not disclosing grill size, which may affect mic durability and protection but specifics are unknown for direct comparison.
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
5.5
inch
0Votes
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.5
inch
0Votes
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.8
inch
0Votes
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
65
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
3/8"
66
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
3/8"
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 supports a wider frequency range on the low end starting from 50 Hz, compared to VideoMic GO’s 100 Hz, enabling better capture of bass and low frequencies, which benefits richer sound recordings.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
50.0 Hz
measurement.
Based on community votes for Frequency Response (Min),
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The MKE 400 boasts a maximum SPL of 132 dB, higher than VideoMic GO's 120 dB, enabling it to handle louder sounds without distortion—ideal for dynamic performances or loud environments.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
12.0 dB
measurement.
Based on community votes for Max SPL,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉,
which got 0 votes.
VideoMic GO offers higher sensitivity at -35 dBV/Pa versus MKE 400’s -42 dBV/Pa, meaning VideoMic GO can pick up quieter sounds more easily, aiding in capturing subtle audio details.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
7.0 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
80
dB
0Votes
vs
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
VideoMic GO reports a signal-to-noise ratio of 80 dB, while this info isn’t provided for MKE 400; a higher ratio like VideoMic GO's means cleaner sound with less noise, favoring clearer recordings.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
39
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Unidirectional
vs
Directionality
VideoMic GO uses a unidirectional pickup pattern, while MKE 400 lists directionality as n/a, though it uses a supercardioid polar pattern; this suggests MKE 400 offers superior side noise rejection.
General pickup orientation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
200
ohm
0Votes
vs
Output Impedance
VideoMic GO has output impedance of 200 ohms; MKE 400 specifies minimum terminating impedance of 1000 ohms, which can affect compatibility with certain preamps and influences signal matching.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 extends to a high-frequency response ceiling of 20,000 Hz, compared to the VideoMic GO's 16,000 Hz, giving MKE 400 an edge in capturing finer high-frequency details like cymbals and vocals.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
4,000.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
96
dB
0Votes
vs
Dynamic Range
VideoMic GO’s dynamic range is 96 dB, representing the capacity to handle loud to soft sounds well; MKE 400’s dynamic range isn’t specified, potentially limiting detailed loudness control info for buyers.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400’s equivalent noise level is 21 dB compared to VideoMic GO’s 34 dB, indicating the MKE 400 operates with much less self-noise, producing cleaner recordings especially in quiet conditions.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
13.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
30
dB
0Votes
vs
Off-Axis Rejection
VideoMic GO offers 30 dB off-axis rejection, reducing unwanted sounds from sides; MKE 400’s off-axis rejection data is missing but may be less optimized for background noise suppression.
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
30
dB
0Votes
vs
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
VideoMic GO has an acoustic noise isolation rating of 30 dB, effectively lowering ambient noise, whereas MKE 400 does not specify this rating, making VideoMic GO potentially better for isolating sound in noisy areas.
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
67
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Stepped
vs
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
VideoMic GO features stepped polar pattern switching precision, adding reliability in pattern selection, while MKE 400 doesn’t support multi-pattern switching, limiting its versatility in pattern control.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
-38
dBV/Pa
0Votes
vs
Output Level
VideoMic GO outputs an output level of -38 dBV/Pa, while MKE 400 does not provide this measurement; output level affects signal strength and may influence compatibility with recording gear.
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 features a studio-grade internal preamp for superior sound quality, compared to VideoMic GO’s standard preamp, which affects clarity, noise levels, and overall audio fidelity.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
In the battle of Internal Preamp Quality,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
40 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
68
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Condenser
79
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Condenser
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
73
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Small Diaphragm
68
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Small Diaphragm
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
1,000
Ω
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
20
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
-20
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
200
Hz
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
28
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Mono
29
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Mono
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
vs
Voice Isolation Feature
MKE 400 includes a voice isolation feature to reduce background noise, improving vocal clarity, which VideoMic GO lacks, making MKE 400 better for noisy environments.
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
78
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
99
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
In the battle of Acoustic Principle,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
98
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Fast
99
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Fast
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
In the battle of Transient Response,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
120
dB
0Votes
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
98
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Transformerless
59
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Transformerless
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 connects via TRS and TRRS interfaces, versatile for many devices; VideoMic GO uses USB and TRS, adding digital connection capability, which might suit modern computer setups better.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 comes with a detachable cable for easy replacement and portability; VideoMic GO’s cable is not detachable, which may reduce convenience and increase risk of damage over time.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Detachable on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
77
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
USB-C
vs
USB Compatibility
VideoMic GO supports USB-C compatibility, allowing easy digital connection and charging; MKE 400 does not list USB compatibility, pointing to more traditional analog connections only.
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Both mics do not support phantom power, but MKE 400 uses battery power while VideoMic GO uses plug-in power, affecting how each device is powered during use.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
13
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Analog, Unbalanced
49
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Analog
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
36 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
48
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Unbalanced
49
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Unbalanced
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 operates on AAA batteries, providing portable and easy-to-replace power, whereas VideoMic GO relies on plug-in power, restricting mobility but simplifying continuous use.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Battery Life
MKE 400 offers a long battery life of 100 hours, ideal for extended sessions without interruptions; VideoMic GO does not specify battery life, likely because it draws plug-in power instead.
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Both mics feature auto power-off for battery conservation and convenience, enhancing user experience by preventing wasted power if left on unintentionally.
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 supports replaceable batteries, allowing quick swaps during sessions, whereas VideoMic GO lacks this feature, limiting power options.
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 supports external power supply compatibility, offering flexible power options, while VideoMic GO does not, limiting power sources to plug-in only.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Type
What is the battery type?
47
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
AAA
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The type of battery used if portable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
1,050
mAh
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
97
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
USB-C
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator Light
Does it have a power indicator light?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
VideoMic GO includes a mute function for quick audio control, unlike MKE 400 which lacks mute, making VideoMic GO better suited for live control during recordings.
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mute Function on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 provides onboard gain control for direct input level adjustments, a feature missing on VideoMic GO, giving MKE 400 users more precise audio control.
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Gain Control,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉,
which got 0 votes.
MKE 400 includes headphone monitoring, allowing real-time audio feedback, which is absent on the VideoMic GO; this feature benefits users needing immediate sound checks.
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 has LED indicator lights for status feedback, while VideoMic GO does not, improving user awareness of mic operation and settings.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 comes with a multi-mode switch for changing settings on the fly, whereas VideoMic GO does not have this control, limiting adaptability during recording.
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 offers sensitivity preset profiles for quick selection adapted to different environments, which VideoMic GO lacks, making the MKE 400 more versatile and user-friendly for varied scenarios.
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
App/Software Integration
Is it integrated with software/apps?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Rode VideoMic GO
The mic works with compatible Rode apps for easy updates and control. This allows quick firmware upgrades or customization without extra gear.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Onboard Controls
What onboard controls are available?
62
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Buttons, Switches
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Types of direct physical controls.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 body is made from metal, providing durable build and premium feel compared to the VideoMic GO’s plastic body, which may be lighter but less robust.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Body Material,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Both microphones include shock mounts, ensuring reduction of vibration noises, but MKE 400 supports multiple mounting types, enhancing installation options compared to VideoMic GO solely on shock mount.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
VideoMic GO features a built-in pop filter to reduce plosives like 'p' sounds, while MKE 400 does not, beneficial for cleaner vocal recording on the VideoMic GO.
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pop Filter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Both microphones offer detachable mounts, simplifying setup and transport flexibility.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 has a metal grill providing greater protection and durability compared to the plastic grill on VideoMic GO, enhancing longevity and resistance to impacts.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 uses foam as internal dampening material for sound quality control, whereas VideoMic GO uses rubberized material, which might alter internal sound resonance and durability.
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
In the battle of Internal Dampening Material,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 is corrosion resistant, improving durability in harsh environments, while VideoMic GO lacks corrosion resistance, potentially affecting its lifespan under tough conditions.
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
78
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Matte
80
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Matte
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Arm/Stand
Does it have an adjustable arm/stand?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Does it have swivel/pivot capability?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 offers spare parts availability, helpful for long-term maintenance, while VideoMic GO does not, possibly limiting repair options.
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Both models include warranty cards; however, only VideoMic GO has professional broadcast certification whereas MKE 400 does not, which might be preferred by professional broadcast users.
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Tripod
Is a stand/tripod included?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether a stand or tripod is included in the box.
In the battle of Stand/Tripod,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Tripod on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Cables
Are cables included?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cables on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Clip
Is a mounting clip included?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether a clip for attaching to stands/instruments is included.
In the battle of Mounting Clip,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Clip on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Extra Windscreen
Is an extra windscreen included?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Windscreen on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
28
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
Box
80
Rode VideoMic GO
0Votes
Box
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
52 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
49
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
MZH400
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty
What is the warranty period?
2
years
0Votes
2
years
0Votes
vs
Warranty
Both products come with a 2-year warranty, offering equal coverage reassurance.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
equal
2.00 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Compliance
Is it safety compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Compliance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Compliance
Is it environmentally compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
58
Sennheiser MKE 400
0Votes
14° to 131°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology
Does it support beamforming?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Tracking on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Surround Capture Mode
Does it support surround capture?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
Yes
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows?
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No
0Votes
Sennheiser MKE 400
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic GO
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic GO ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉
vs Rode VideoMic GO ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
